From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiful v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 1, 2021
No. 20-6592 (4th Cir. Oct. 1, 2021)

Opinion

20-6592

10-01-2021

ARTHUR DEMERILL SANTIFUL, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee.

Arthur Demerill Santiful, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 14, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00160-AWA-RJK-1; 2:18-cv-00642-AWA)

Arthur Demerill Santiful, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Arthur Demerill Santiful seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Santiful has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Santiful's motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Santiful v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 1, 2021
No. 20-6592 (4th Cir. Oct. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Santiful v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR DEMERILL SANTIFUL, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

No. 20-6592 (4th Cir. Oct. 1, 2021)