From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santifer v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No. EDCV 14-1252-MWF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 14-1252-MWF (JEM)

09-20-2016

COREY DAVID SANTIFER, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied, and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: September 20, 2016

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Santifer v. Virga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 20, 2016
Case No. EDCV 14-1252-MWF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Santifer v. Virga

Case Details

Full title:COREY DAVID SANTIFER, Petitioner, v. TIM VIRGA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 20, 2016

Citations

Case No. EDCV 14-1252-MWF (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2016)