Santifer v. Evans

Full title: BRANDON L. SANTIFER, Petitioner, v. M. EVANS, Warden, Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 30, 2008

No. CIV S-05-2513 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2513 MCE GGH P.

January 30, 2008

ORDER

MORRISON ENGLAND JR., District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 15, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.¹

1 The parties were granted an extension of time to file objections and any reply. See, Order, filed 11/06/07.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 15, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.