Santiago-Vazquez v. State

Full title: Lemuel SANTIAGO–VAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Jan 20, 2016

186 So. 3d 1034 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D15–3991.

01-20-2016

Lemuel SANTIAGO–VAZQUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Lemuel Santiago–Vazquez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Lemuel Santiago–Vazquez, pro se.

Opinion

Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So.2d 238 (Fla.2007); Adaway v. State, 902 So.2d 746 (Fla.2005); Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Steward v. State, 931 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Carpenter v. State, 884 So.2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Shortridge v. State, 884 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Jackson v. State, 640 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Banaszak v. State, 579 So.2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Dailey v. State, 501 So.2d 15 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Johnson v. State, 149 So.3d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Lane v. State, 981 So.2d 596 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Allen v. State, 976 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Williams v. State, 907 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); State v. Curtin, 764 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.