From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. Sarasota Title Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 12, 2021
8:21-cv-627-WFJ-AAS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

8:21-cv-627-WFJ-AAS

08-12-2021

BRITTNEY SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, v. SARASOTA TITLE SERVICES, INC. and LILLIAN DENHAM, Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM F. JUNG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has been advised by the Mediation Report (Dkt. 30) that the above-styled action has been settled. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 3.09, M.D.Fla., it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this cause is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice and subject to the right of the parties, within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment should they so choose or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause shown. After that 60-day period, however, dismissal shall be with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions/deadlines and to CLOSE the file.

DONE and ORDERED


Summaries of

Santiago v. Sarasota Title Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Aug 12, 2021
8:21-cv-627-WFJ-AAS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Santiago v. Sarasota Title Servs.

Case Details

Full title:BRITTNEY SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, v. SARASOTA TITLE SERVICES, INC. and LILLIAN…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

8:21-cv-627-WFJ-AAS (M.D. Fla. Aug. 12, 2021)