From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1985
112 A.D.2d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

August 5, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Walsh, J.).


Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment in his favor denied, and upon searching the record, summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, and it is declared that the no-fault provisions of New Jersey law are inapplicable to plaintiff's claims for no-fault benefits arising out of the accident in that State on December 24, 1982.

By its terms, New Jersey's no-fault law only applies to automobiles registered or principally garaged in New Jersey (NJ Stats Ann § 39:6A-3; Morgan v. Bisorni, 100 A.D.2d 956). Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Santiago v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1985
112 A.D.2d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Santiago v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JUAN E. SANTIAGO, Respondent, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 5, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Talron Enters. v. Garcia

Third-party defendant GEICO therefore would have sole responsibility as the insurer of defendants Dalmasi and…

Talron Enterprises, Inc. v. Garcia

"Under the [New Jersey] statute a nonresident in a non-New Jersey registered or insured vehicle, injured in…