From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. Marsh

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2022
Civil Action 21-1258 (E.D. Pa. May. 5, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-1258

05-05-2022

SAMUEL SANTIAGO v. DR. ROBERT MARSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF:


ORDER

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE J.

NOW, this 5th day of May, 2022, upon consideration of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 5), the response to the Petition, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret (Doc. No. 19), and no objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

3. No certificate of appealability shall issue because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).


Summaries of

Santiago v. Marsh

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2022
Civil Action 21-1258 (E.D. Pa. May. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Santiago v. Marsh

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SANTIAGO v. DR. ROBERT MARSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 5, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-1258 (E.D. Pa. May. 5, 2022)