From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. Granholm

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 6, 2008
Case No. 1:07-CV-1156 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07-CV-1156.

March 6, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff Michael R. Santiago Sr. has, after entry of a Judgment which he has appealed, filed a Motion for Leave to Appeal and a Motion to Amend his Complaint. Neither Motion is apt. The Motion for Leave to Appeal is unnecessary because an indigent prisoner since the Circuit's McGore decision has had the right to appeal any adverse decision in a civil rights case, notwithstanding whether the appeal is in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 604 (6th Cir. 1997); Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 432 (7th Cir. 1997); Starks v. Reno, 2000 WL 353526, *2 (6th Cir. Mar. 31, 2000). To the extent that Plaintiff is seeking reconsideration of the adverse appeal certification, that request is denied because Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a palpable defect requiring a different disposition. See W.D. Mich. L. Civ. R. 7.4(a). Plaintiff's Motion to Amend is moot because his request to voluntarily dismiss particular claims is made after entry of the adverse Judgment.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and Motion for Leave to Appeal (Dkt. Nos. 11 12) are DENIED.


Summaries of

Santiago v. Granholm

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 6, 2008
Case No. 1:07-CV-1156 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Santiago v. Granholm

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL R. SANTIAGO SR., Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER GRANHOLM, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 6, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:07-CV-1156 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2008)