From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 4, 2014
No. 13CV3951-LTS-SN (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2014)

Summary

remanding to allow ALJ to obtain opinions from treating physicians where the record contained differing opinions concerning claimant's disability

Summary of this case from Rivera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

No. 13CV3951-LTS-SN

08-04-2014

GEORGE SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pro se George Santiago ("Plaintiff"), brings this action, pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying his application for Supplemental Security Insurance ("SSI") benefits. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (the "Report") of Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, recommending that the Commissioner's motion be denied. No objections to the Report have been filed.

When reviewing a report and recommendation, the Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C.S. § 636(b)(1)(C) (LexisNexis 2012). "To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)).

Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Netburn's thorough and well-reasoned Report, to which no objection was made, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court denies the Commissioner's motion. This case is remanded to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report and this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment and close this case. This Order resolves docket entry no. 19.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

August 4, 2014

/s/_________

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge
Copy mailed to:
George Santiago
2625 3rd Avenue
Apt. 4-D
Bronx, NY 10451


Summaries of

Santiago v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 4, 2014
No. 13CV3951-LTS-SN (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2014)

remanding to allow ALJ to obtain opinions from treating physicians where the record contained differing opinions concerning claimant's disability

Summary of this case from Rivera v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

noting that an ALJ must evaluate these factors if he or she wishes "to discredit the opinion of a treating physician"

Summary of this case from Santiago v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Santiago v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 4, 2014

Citations

No. 13CV3951-LTS-SN (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2014)

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

F.Supp.3d at 815 (quoting Sanchez, 2015 WL at 736102, at *7); see also Guillen v. Berryhill, 697 Fed. App'x…

Stephanie M. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

In this circuit, the rule is robust.” Santiago v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 13-CV-3951(LTS)(SN), 2014…