Summary
denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissing petition for writ of certiorari, and directing Clerk not to accept any further petitions in non-criminal matters from petitioner unless docketing fee paid, due to repeated abuse of the Supreme Court's process
Summary of this case from IMO Inv. S.E. v. United StatesOpinion
No. 09–9067.
03-22-2010
Israel SANTIAGO–LUGO, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).
Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397, and cases cited therein.