From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santander Bank v. Demaio

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 5, 2021
No. A-0515-20 (App. Div. Oct. 5, 2021)

Opinion

A-0515-20

10-05-2021

SANTANDER BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CARMINE A. DEMAIO, III, Defendant-Appellant, and FRANK C. HOLTHAM, JR., Defendant

Sills, Cummis & Gross, PC, attorneys for appellant (David W. Phillips and Richard Michael Riecken, of counsel and on the briefs). Saldutti Law Group, attorneys for respondent (Thomas B. O'Connell, of counsel and on the brief).


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Submitted September 27, 2021

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Burlington County, Docket No. L-2393-19.

Sills, Cummis & Gross, PC, attorneys for appellant (David W. Phillips and Richard Michael Riecken, of counsel and on the briefs).

Saldutti Law Group, attorneys for respondent (Thomas B. O'Connell, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges Rothstadt and Mayer.

PER CURIAM

The court, being advised by the parties prior to argument that this matter has been amicably resolved, accordingly dismisses the appeal with prejudice and without costs to either party.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Santander Bank v. Demaio

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 5, 2021
No. A-0515-20 (App. Div. Oct. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Santander Bank v. Demaio

Case Details

Full title:SANTANDER BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CARMINE A. DEMAIO, III…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 5, 2021

Citations

No. A-0515-20 (App. Div. Oct. 5, 2021)