From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santana v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Dec 10, 1928
118 So. 738 (Fla. 1928)

Opinion

Decision filed December 10, 1928.

A writ of error to the Criminal Court of Record for Hillsborough county; W. Raleigh Petteway, Judge.

J. O. Hillis, Attorney for Plaintiff in Error;

Fred H. Davis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Attorneys for the Defendant in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

ELLIS, C. J., AND STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Santana v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A
Dec 10, 1928
118 So. 738 (Fla. 1928)
Case details for

Santana v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK SANTANA, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division A

Date published: Dec 10, 1928

Citations

118 So. 738 (Fla. 1928)
118 So. 738