From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santana v. Gravagna

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2022
21-CV-08724 (PGG)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-08724 (PGG)(SN)

06-08-2022

ALTAGRACIA SANTANA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PETER GRAVAGNA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge.

On March 17, 2022, Plaintiffs filed safe harbor notices regarding prospective Rule 11 sanctions against various Defendants and their counsel. See ECF Nos. 92-95. It is unclear whether Plaintiffs have indeed served Defendants and counsel with motions for Rule 11 sanctions since then, or whether any such motions would be rendered moot by a dispositive decision by the Court on Defendants' motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment. By June 10, 2022, the parties and counsel to whom Plaintiffs addressed safe harbor notices are to file letters informing the Court whether Plaintiffs have served any motions for Rule 11 sanctions. To the extent that Plaintiffs have not done so, they shall not serve any such motions pending further order of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Santana v. Gravagna

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2022
21-CV-08724 (PGG)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Santana v. Gravagna

Case Details

Full title:ALTAGRACIA SANTANA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PETER GRAVAGNA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 8, 2022

Citations

21-CV-08724 (PGG)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2022)