From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santana v. Gastelo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 26, 2020
CV 20-11296-JWH(E) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2020)

Opinion

CV 20-11296-JWH(E)

07-26-2020

JUAN CARLOS SANTANA, Petitioner, v. JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

JOHN W. HOLCOMB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Petitioner filed a “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody” on December 10, 2020, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss on March 16, 2021. Petitioner requested a stay on May 19, 2021.

In an “Order Re Motion to Dismiss, etc., ” filed June 28, 2021, the Court, inter alia, denied Petitioner's request for a stay and required Petitioner to file “either: (1) a document stating Petitioner's intent to delete and abandon Grounds Two, Three and Four of the Petition; or (2) a document requesting dismissal of this entire proceeding without prejudice.” Petitioner has elected option (2). See "Petitioner's Response, etc.," filed July 12, 2021 ("Petitioner Juan Carlos Santana's federal writ of habeas corpus petition should be dismissed without prejudice").

Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a); see also Commercial Space Management Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999) (dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on the filing of a notice of dismissal).

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Santana v. Gastelo

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 26, 2020
CV 20-11296-JWH(E) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Santana v. Gastelo

Case Details

Full title:JUAN CARLOS SANTANA, Petitioner, v. JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 26, 2020

Citations

CV 20-11296-JWH(E) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 26, 2020)