From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santana v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 21, 2017
CV NO. 16-00367 ACK-KJM (D. Haw. Sep. 21, 2017)

Opinion

CV NO. 16-00367 ACK-KJM

09-21-2017

ROBERT K. SANTANA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on August 31, 2017, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation To Grant in Part and Deny in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees", ECF No. 28, are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 21, 2017.

/s/_________

Alan C. Kay

Sr. United States District Judge


Summaries of

Santana v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 21, 2017
CV NO. 16-00367 ACK-KJM (D. Haw. Sep. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Santana v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT K. SANTANA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Sep 21, 2017

Citations

CV NO. 16-00367 ACK-KJM (D. Haw. Sep. 21, 2017)

Citing Cases

HB Prods. v. Faizan

This district court has previously declined to impose a reduction for blockbilled entries where “limited…

Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cnty. of Maui

In doing so, the court found “limited instances” of block-billing that did not prevent the court from…