From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santa Fe All. for Pub. Health & Safety v. City of Santa Fe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
May 6, 2020
Civ. No. 18-1209 KG/JHR (D.N.M. May. 6, 2020)

Opinion

Civ. No. 18-1209 KG/JHR

05-06-2020

SANTA FE ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY; ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG; and MONIKA STEINHOFF, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of New Mexico; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

Having granted Defendant City of Santa Fe's Amended Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, (Doc. 21), and Defendant United States' Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 46), and having declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state claims, all by a Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously with this Final Judgment,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' federal claims are dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiffs' state law claims are dismissed without prejudice, and this lawsuit is terminated in its entirety.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Santa Fe All. for Pub. Health & Safety v. City of Santa Fe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
May 6, 2020
Civ. No. 18-1209 KG/JHR (D.N.M. May. 6, 2020)
Case details for

Santa Fe All. for Pub. Health & Safety v. City of Santa Fe

Case Details

Full title:SANTA FE ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY; ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: May 6, 2020

Citations

Civ. No. 18-1209 KG/JHR (D.N.M. May. 6, 2020)

Citing Cases

Janny v. Palmer

Further, the Fifth Amendment governs actions by the federal government and the Fourteenth Amendment governs…

Bervinchak v. E. Hempfield Twp.

Regardless, Plaintiffs have not alleged that they have an interest that is protected under the Fourteenth…