From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sansoucie v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE .
Oct 4, 2016
507 S.W.3d 65 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. ED 103142

10-04-2016

Theodore J. SANSOUCIE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Christine Lesicko, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


Srikant Chigurupati, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Christine Lesicko, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, C.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Theodore Sansoucie, appeals the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.We affirm the motion court's judgment denying the movant's Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Sansoucie v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE .
Oct 4, 2016
507 S.W.3d 65 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Sansoucie v. State

Case Details

Full title:Theodore J. SANSOUCIE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FIVE .

Date published: Oct 4, 2016

Citations

507 S.W.3d 65 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)