From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sansom Rep. v. Feiner, Klaris Curtis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1971
69 Misc. 2d 215 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)

Opinion

December 20, 1971

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, MAURICE WAHL, J.

Frank M. Nigro and Jesse Sobol for appellants.

Harry Salvan for respondent.


Defendants, members of a law firm, ordered from plaintiff daily copy of the minutes of a hearing before the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with a matter involving their client. Although the order blank was signed by a member of the firm in individual name it identified the case and included the name of the client. There is no showing that the attorneys intended to be personally liable for these minutes and, in these circumstances, under established law they are not responsible. (For the general rule of the law of agency see Mencher v. Weiss, 306 N.Y. 1,4 and cases there cited; for the specific rule relating to attorneys see Matter of May, 27 N.Y.2d 529 and cases there cited.)

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for the defendants dismissing the complaint.

Concur — GOLD, J.P., QUINN and LUPIANO, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Sansom Rep. v. Feiner, Klaris Curtis

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 20, 1971
69 Misc. 2d 215 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)
Case details for

Sansom Rep. v. Feiner, Klaris Curtis

Case Details

Full title:SANSOM REPORTING, INC., Respondent, v. FEINER, KLARIS CURTIS et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1971

Citations

69 Misc. 2d 215 (N.Y. App. Term 1971)
329 N.Y.S.2d 984

Citing Cases

Christensen v. Dep't of Revenue

This includes charges owed agents hired by the attorney to provide services for the client. Sansom Reporting,…