From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanrio Co. v. J.I.K. Accessories, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2011
Civil Action No. C 09-00440 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. C 09-00440 EMC

11-21-2011

SANRIO COMPANY, LTD., a Japanese corporation and SANRIO, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiffs, v. J.I.K. Accessories, Inc., Accessitive Accessories, Inc., B.B. Apparels Inc., Amuseco Accessories, Inc., Nana Accessory, Inc., Seanna Corporation, Heiress Enterprises, Inc., Pinkland Corporation, Inc., Bliss, Final Choice, Joon Sik Bae, Yong Woo Kim, Any Bae, Jason Bae, Brian Ban, Ryan Bae, Ho Yong Na, Sang Wha Kim, Aeran Bae a/k/a Chris Bae, Jenny J. Lee, Sukrnin Bae, John Bae, Lisa Bae, Grace Kim, Ken Chung, Yeun Sik Cha, Debbie Kim, DOES 1- 10, Defendants

OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C. NOEL M. COOK LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL Attorneys for Plaintiffs SANRIO COMPANY, LTD., and SANRIO, INC, LEACH & MCGREEVY RICHARD EARL MCGREEVY Attorney for Defendants, JOHN BAE AND AERON BAE


NOEL M. COOK, SBN 122777

LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL, SBN 164283

ALICA DEL VALLE, SBN 246006

OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SANRIO COMPANY, LTD. and SANRIO, INC.

STIPULATED FACTS AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPPORT

OF [PROPOSED]

FINAL JUDGMENT ON CONSENT:

JOHN, AERON BAE A/K/A CHRIS BAE,

AND CERTAIN BLISS AND FINAL

CHOICE BUSINESSES

WHEREAS, on January 30, 2009, Sanrio Company, Ltd. and Sanrio, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") initiated the instant action against the named defendants as set forth above for trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114, et seq.; copyright infringement in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 501, et seq.; unfair competition in violation of 15 U.S.C. §1125(a) et seq., as amended; unfair competition under the law of the State of California, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.; and common law unfair competition.

WHEREAS, Defendants John Bae and Aeron Bae aka Chris Bae, individually and doing business as "Bliss" or "Bliss Axcessories," located at 12478 North Main St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, and "Final Choice," located at 3376 South Bristol Street, Santa Ana, California 92704 (collectively, "Defendants") and Plaintiffs have concluded a settlement resolving Plaintiffs' claims against these Defendants in this civil action;

WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs and Defendants (the "Parties") wish to resolve this civil action through the entry of Judgment on Consent;

WHEREAS, without admitting that they knowingly infringed Plaintiffs' rights and specifically denying same, Defendants consent to the entry of Judgment on Consent;

WHEREAS, each Party has waived the right to appeal from the Judgment on Consent;

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate to the following facts and conclusions of law:

STIPULATED FACTS

1. Plaintiff Sanrio Co., Ltd. ("Sanrio") is a Japanese corporation and maintains its principal place of business located at 1-6-1 Osaki, Shinagawa ku, Tokyo 141-8603, Japan. Plaintiff Sanrio, Inc. is a California corporation and maintains its principal place of business at 570 Eccles Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080.

2. Since 1960, Sanrio Co., Ltd. has been engaged in the business of manufacturing, distributing and selling products for use by children and young adults. All of Sanrio's products are marked with the SANRIO trade name and mark. Since 1976, Sanrio, Inc. has been the exclusive United States distributor of the products of Sanrio Co., Ltd. and is currently the exclusive United States master licensee of the rights in and to the SANRIO trademarks and copyrights.

3. Sanrio is the creator and owner of the famous HELLO KITTY, KEROKEROKEROPPI a/k/a KEROPPI, and CHARMMY KITTY characters, as well as many other characters, as depicted in Exhibit 2 of the Complaint in this action. Since 1976, most of Sanrio's merchandise marketed in the U. S. has displayed HELLO KITTY character artwork on the products and product packaging. Since 1988, KEROPPI character artwork has appeared on numerous Sanrio products and product packaging marketed in the U.S. Since 2004, CHARMMY KITTY character artwork has appeared on numerous Sanrio products and product packaging marketed in the U.S.

4. Sanrio owns many U.S. Certificates of Copyright Registration for artwork depicting the Sanrio Characters, including the following Registration Nos.: VA 130-420, VA 1-303-874 and Vau 684-322 and VA 1-342-775 (HELLO KITTY); VA 707-212 and VA 636-579 (KEROPPI); and VA 1-296-111 (CHARMMY KITTY) (the "Sanrio Registered Copyrights").

5. Sanrio owns several U.S. Trademark registrations, including U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 1,200,083 and 1,277,721 for the design trademark depicting the head of the HELLO KITTY character; and 1,215,436 and 1,279,486 for the word mark HELLO KITTY, all of which are incontestable (collectively, "Sanrio's Registered Trademarks").

6. In addition to owning the foregoing federal trademark registrations, Sanrio owns all common law rights (including trademark and trade dress rights) to the HELLO KITTY character name and design, and the KEROPPI and CHARMMY KITTY character designs (collectively, "Sanrio's Common Law Trademarks").

7. Defendants John Bae and Chris Bae are individual residents of California, who were at all relevant times actively engaged in the operation, management and/or control of the retail businesses called "Bliss" or "Bliss Axcessories," located at 12478 North Main St., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, and "Final Choice," located at 3376 South Bristol Street, Santa Ana, California 92704 (the "retail stores").

8. Defendants are not authorized to manufacture, import, distribute, or sell Sanrio merchandise.

9. During at least the year 2007, Defendants displayed and offered for sale various counterfeit products depicting the HELLO KITTY character, and/or the KEROPPI and/or CHARMMY KITTY characters, at their retail stores (the "Counterfeit Merchandise").

STIPULATED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

10. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this civil action.

11. Sanrio owns valid copyrights, trademarks and trade dress in the name and design of the Hello Kitty Character.

12. The Counterfeit Merchandise distributed and sold by Defendants contained counterfeit versions of Sanrio's Registered Copyrights, Sanrio's Registered Trademarks, and Sanrio's Common Law Trademarks.

13. The acts of Defendants constitute copyright infringement, in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 501.

14. The acts of Defendants constitute trademark and trade dress infringement, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1125(a).

15. The acts of Defendants constitute unfair competition in violation of 15 U.S.C. §1125(a) et seq., as amended, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.; and common law.

The Parties, either themselves or through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the above facts and conclusions and consent to the entry of Judgment on Consent pursuant to the separately fded Proposed Judgment on Consent.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C.

NOEL M. COOK

LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SANRIO COMPANY, LTD., and SANRIO, INC,

LEACH & MCGREEVY

RICHARD EARL MCGREEVY

Attorney for Defendants,

JOHN BAE AND AERON BAE

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

Sanrio Co. v. J.I.K. Accessories, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 21, 2011
Civil Action No. C 09-00440 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Sanrio Co. v. J.I.K. Accessories, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SANRIO COMPANY, LTD., a Japanese corporation and SANRIO, INC., a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 21, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. C 09-00440 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)