Sanner v. Jurgensen

Full title: RAY SANNER, Petitioner, v. B. JURGENSEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Dec 22, 2011

CV 10-3779 JAK (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2011)

Opinion

RAY SANNER, Petitioner, v. B. JURGENSEN, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 10-3779 JAK (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California. December 22, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition with prejudice.