From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanko S.S. Co., Ltd. v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 29, 2001
272 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

No. 99-17538.

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2001.

Filed November 29, 2001.

Eric Danoff, Emard, Danoff, Port Tamulski, LLP, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Stephen G. Flynn and Warren A. Schneider, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-01667-MMC.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.


Sanko Steamship Co. appeals the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction in a published order, 2000 A.M.C. 83 (N.D.Cal. 1999), of its claim that the United States of America breached a duty to warn of a shoal in the Sacramento Deepwater Ship Channel. In determining that the United States was immune under the Flood Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 702c, the district court relied on the "wholly unrelated" test, as more fully discussed in Central Green Co. v. United States, 177 F.3d 834 (9th Cir. 1999). Since the time that the district court issued its decision, however, the United States Supreme Court reversed Central Green and established a more restrictive test for determining sovereign immunity. Central Green Co. v. United States, 531 U.S. 425, 121 S.Ct. 1005, 148 L.Ed.2d 919 (2001). Because this new test involves determination of facts that have not been fully developed, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court's Central Green decision.

REVERSED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Sanko S.S. Co., Ltd. v. U.S.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 29, 2001
272 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

Sanko S.S. Co., Ltd. v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:SANKO STEAMSHIP CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 29, 2001

Citations

272 F.3d 1231 (9th Cir. 2001)