Opinion
No. 07-71133.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Decided: March 31, 2010.
Law Office of David Paz-Soldan, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency Nos. A029-494-298, A029-494-301.
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Maria Isabel Sanjur and her daughter, Maria Isabel Sanjur, natives and citizens of Panama, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo due process claims due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners' motion to reopen where Petitioners lacked "plausible grounds for relief." See Rojas-Garcia v. Askcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003).
Petitioners' remaining contentions are unpersuasive.