From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sangster v. Lemke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 14, 2014
Case No. 13 C 8488 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13 C 8488

02-14-2014

JULIUS J. SANGSTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL LEMKE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This Court has just received the Judge's Copy of an In Forma Pauperis Application ("Application") signed by co-plaintiff Julius Sangster ("Sangster") and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel ("Motion") submitted by both plaintiffs, Sangster and Cynita Collins. Both of those documents are much belated partial responses to this Court's November 27, 2013 memorandum order ("Order") that dismissed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Because the Order concluded by denying both the then-tendered Application and Motion as moot, this Court sees little point (if any) in dealing with the current submissions (which have their own defects). Accordingly both the current Application and the current Motion are also denied as moot.

___________________

Milton I. Shadur

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sangster v. Lemke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 14, 2014
Case No. 13 C 8488 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Sangster v. Lemke

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS J. SANGSTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL LEMKE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 14, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13 C 8488 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 2014)