From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sango v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2014
Case No. 13-12808 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13-12808

03-06-2014

ROBERT SANGO, Plaintiff, v. DAPHNE JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW


MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [51]

AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [25, 26, 30, 32, 39, 48] AND

ORDERING OTHER RELIEF

On March 4, 2014, Magistrate Judge Randon issued a Report and Recommendation [51] after a phone conference held on February 24, 2014 that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [25, 26, 30, 32, 39, 48] be denied without prejudice and Plaintiff be afforded other relief. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Randon recommended

1. ARUS Ault should be ordered not to retaliate against Sango;
2. ARUS Ault should be ordered to instruct the correctional officers under his control not to retaliate against Sango;
3. During the pendency of this case, Sango should be ordered to request the legal supplies he needs from ARUS Ault or his successor;
4. ARUS Ault should ensure Sango's reasonable requests for the legal supplies he needs to prosecute this case are granted; and,
5. ARUS Ault should be ordered to ensure Sango receives the appropriate health care pursuant to MDOC policy.

The Court having reviewed the record, the Report and Recommendation [51] of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [25, 26, 30, 32, 39, 48] is DENIED without prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is afforded the other relief elucidated in this order and the Report and Recommendation [51].

SO ORDERED.

__________________________

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify on March 6, 2014 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following non-registered ECF participants on March 6, 2014: Robert Sango.

Michael E. Lang

Case Manager to

District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow

(313) 234-5182


Summaries of

Sango v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 6, 2014
Case No. 13-12808 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2014)
Case details for

Sango v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SANGO, Plaintiff, v. DAPHNE JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-12808 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2014)