From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sango v. Burns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 2, 2016
Case No. 1:15-CV-365 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-CV-365

03-02-2016

ROBERT D. SANGO, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN BURNS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 8, 2016, Magistrate Judge Ray Kent issued a Report and Recommendation that recommended that the Court deny motions filed by each party. Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed February 8, 2016 (ECF No. 30), is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 9) and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 12) are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18) is DENIED. Dated: March 2, 2016

/s/ Gordon J. Quist

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sango v. Burns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 2, 2016
Case No. 1:15-CV-365 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Sango v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT D. SANGO, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN BURNS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:15-CV-365 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 2, 2016)

Citing Cases

Cosgrove v. Miller

Cary v. Eaton, No. 11-CV-13151, 2011 WL 4916676, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 17, 2011). See also Sango v. Burns,…