From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. Gemo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 6, 2023
2:21-cv-00824-DAD-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00824-DAD-JDP (PC)

10-06-2023

JEVON SANFORD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. G. GEMO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On July 17, 2023, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 36. When plaintiff did not file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within the twenty-one days after the motion was served, I ordered him to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders. ECF No. 38. On October 2, 2023, plaintiff filed a request for status, claiming that he has not received any mail regarding this case since May 2023. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff states that he sought via email a case update from defense counsel, but that counsel said she could not advise him. Id. at 2.

Out of an abundance of caution, I will direct defendants to re-serve their motion for summary judgment on plaintiff. Plaintiff shall file a response to defendants' motion within twenty-one days after the motion was re-served.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs request for status, ECF No. 39, is granted.
2. Defendants shall re-serve their motion for summary judgment on plaintiff within fourteen days of this order's entry.
3. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion within twenty-one days of service of the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanford v. Gemo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 6, 2023
2:21-cv-00824-DAD-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Sanford v. Gemo

Case Details

Full title:JEVON SANFORD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. G. GEMO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 6, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-00824-DAD-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2023)