From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. City of Franklin Va

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2016
No. 16-1204 (4th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-1204

08-29-2016

KENNETH L. SANFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF FRANKLIN VA, Defendant - Appellee.

Kenneth L. Sanford, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Kailani Memmer, Johneal M. White, GLENN, ROBINSON & CATHEY PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:15-cv-00521-RAJ-RJK) Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth L. Sanford, Appellant Pro Se. Cathleen Kailani Memmer, Johneal M. White, GLENN, ROBINSON & CATHEY PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth L. Sanford appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanford v. City of Franklin, VA, No. 2:15-cv-00521-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2016). We deny Sanford's motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sanford v. City of Franklin Va

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2016
No. 16-1204 (4th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Sanford v. City of Franklin Va

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH L. SANFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF FRANKLIN VA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 29, 2016

Citations

No. 16-1204 (4th Cir. Aug. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Sanford v. City of Franklin

On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the District Court's judgment.…