From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. Bracewell LLP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
17-mc-463 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

17-mc-463 (VSB)

07-11-2022

CRAIG SANFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRACEWELL LLP, Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed this miscellaneous case requesting the ability to issue subpoenas from this Court to be able to serve and enforce arbitration subpoenas from the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution in New York City. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiffs did nothing further. On July 16, 2021, I ordered Plaintiffs “to inform me by July 22, 2021, whether Plaintiffs still request administrative subpoenas or whether this case can be closed.” (Doc. 4.) Plaintiffs did not respond to my order.

Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate this action.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanford v. Bracewell LLP

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
17-mc-463 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Sanford v. Bracewell LLP

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG SANFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRACEWELL LLP, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

17-mc-463 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)