From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford St. Local Dev. v. Textron Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D
Nov 13, 1991
805 F. Supp. 29 (W.D. Mich. 1991)

Opinion

No. 1:90-CV-582.

November 13, 1991.

Steven C. Kohl, Charles E. Barbieri, Landman, Latimer, Clink Robb, Muskegon, Mich., for third-party defendants and counter-plaintiffs Delta Properties, Inc., Bruce D. Langlois, Bruce P. Langlois, Joel J. Langlois and Kim Sue Sorrelle.

Devin S. Schindler, Warner, Norcross Judd, Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant and third-party plaintiff CWC Textron, Inc.

Thomas C. Shearer, McShane Bowie, Lansing, Mich., for third-party defendant Great Lakes Development Inc.


ORDER


The Court, having reviewed the parties Stipulation, hereby orders:

1. That the Court's August 8, 1991, 768 F. Supp. 1218, Order and Opinion granting in part and denying in part Defendant Textron's and Third Party Defendant Delta's Motions For Partial Summary Judgment is hereby vacated;

2. That notwithstanding this vacation, the August 8, 1991, Order and Opinion will continue to have precedential effect among these parties, subject to the right of appeal, in any lawsuits brought by or against any of these parties against any of the other parties regarding environmental contamination at any property formerly owned by Textron; and,

3. That upon completion of all other obligations under the parties' settlement agreement, this action, with the exception of the third party complaint against Great Lakes and judgment thereon, will be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.


Summaries of

Sanford St. Local Dev. v. Textron Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D
Nov 13, 1991
805 F. Supp. 29 (W.D. Mich. 1991)
Case details for

Sanford St. Local Dev. v. Textron Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD STREET LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Michigan nonprofit…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D

Date published: Nov 13, 1991

Citations

805 F. Supp. 29 (W.D. Mich. 1991)

Citing Cases

Schwartzman, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

"A negligence per se claim alleging a violation of [a statute] is little different than an implied right of…

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hess

However, the lack of a private right of action under HOLA does not necessarily preclude the possibility of…