From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanelco, Inc. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 16, 1969
229 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1969)

Opinion

No. 38569.

July 2, 1969. Rehearing Denied September 16, 1969.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

E.O. Palermo and Richard G. Davis, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings Evans, Tampa, for petitioners.

Rodney Durrance, of Stanley, Durrance, Woods Wines, Auburndale, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 4, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The Petition for Attorney's Fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

ERVIN, C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanelco, Inc. v. Wells

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 16, 1969
229 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1969)
Case details for

Sanelco, Inc. v. Wells

Case Details

Full title:SANELCO, INC. AND MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, PETITIONERS, v. ROGER WELLS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 16, 1969

Citations

229 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1969)

Citing Cases

Woods v. City of La Follette

Where an insurance company insures a city under the Workmen's Compensation Act, and the policy expressly…

State v. Bank of California, N.A.

There, as here, the act contained no provision relative to the revocation of the election, once made. While…