From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandoz Inc. v. M & S Pharmacy, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2021
CASE NO. 9:19-CV-232-RC-ZJH (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2021)

Opinion

CASE NO. 9:19-CV-232-RC-ZJH

01-13-2021

SANDOZ INC., Plaintiff, v. M & S PHARMACY, INC., DAVID G. BRADLEY, GARTH A. HINZE, DAVID R. HUMPHRIES, and BEN EUGENE JACOB, Defendants.


**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters. On December 21, 2020, Judge Hawthorn issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #47) denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. #39). To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report and recommendation and the time for doing so has passed.

After a de novo review, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the court agrees with Judge Hawthorn's recommended disposition and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #47). Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Doc. #39) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED, Jan 13, 2021.

/s/_________

Ron Clark

Senior Judge


Summaries of

Sandoz Inc. v. M & S Pharmacy, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2021
CASE NO. 9:19-CV-232-RC-ZJH (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Sandoz Inc. v. M & S Pharmacy, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SANDOZ INC., Plaintiff, v. M & S PHARMACY, INC., DAVID G. BRADLEY, GARTH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 13, 2021

Citations

CASE NO. 9:19-CV-232-RC-ZJH (E.D. Tex. Jan. 13, 2021)