From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandoval v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 4, 2018
414 P.3d 581 (Wash. 2018)

Opinion

No. 95239-6

04-04-2018

Lorenzo Gino SANDOVAL, Petitioner, v. Cheryl L. SULLIVAN, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file the petition for review is denied, and therefore the petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Sandoval v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 4, 2018
414 P.3d 581 (Wash. 2018)
Case details for

Sandoval v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:Lorenzo Gino SANDOVAL, Petitioner, v. Cheryl L. SULLIVAN, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Apr 4, 2018

Citations

414 P.3d 581 (Wash. 2018)
190 Wash. 2d 1007
190 Wn. 2d 1007