From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandoval v. Sofradim Prod. SAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-011726 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 3, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-011726

11-03-2020

IGNACIA G. SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, v. SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS, et al., Defendants.


MEM ORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On October 19, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before November 2, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that this case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: November 3, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sandoval v. Sofradim Prod. SAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Nov 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-011726 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Sandoval v. Sofradim Prod. SAS

Case Details

Full title:IGNACIA G. SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, v. SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Nov 3, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-011726 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 3, 2020)