Opinion
Civil Action 21-17705 (BRM) (LDW) 21-17717 (BRM) (LDW) 21-17723 (BRM) (LDW)
01-14-2022
ROBERT SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, v. LIFECELL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ERIC BRAUM, Plaintiff, v. LIFECELL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. THOMAS GATES, Plaintiff, v. LIFECELL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
HON. BRIAN R. MARTINOTTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
THIS MATTER is opened to the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Leda D. Wettre, U.S.M.J., dated December 3, 2021 (ECF No. 19 in 2:21-cv-17705-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 19 in 2:21-cv-17723-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 19 in 2:21-cv-17717-BRM-LDW), wherein she recommends that the Motions to Remand (ECF No. 11 in 2:21-cv-17705-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 11 in 2:21-cv-17723-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 11 in 2:21-cv-17717-BRM-LDW) be denied and that plaintiffs are not entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).
The parties were given the opportunity to respond or object to Judge Wettre's Report and Recommendation by December 17, 2021, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1(c)(2); to date, no party has responded or objected to the Report and Recommendation. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation; and it appearing the Court should adopt the Report and Recommendation without modification;
IT IS on this 14th day of January 2022, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19 in 2:21-cv-17705-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 19 in 2:21-cv-17723-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 19 in 2:21-cv-17717-BRM-LDW) is hereby adopted in its entirety and entered; and it is further
ORDERED that the motions to remand (ECF No. 11 in 2:21-cv-17705-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 11 in 2:21-cv-17723-BRM-LDW; ECF No. 11 in 2:21-cv-17717-BRM-LDW) is DENIED.