From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandoval v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 9, 2017
Case No. EDCV 13-1313-MWF (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 13-1313-MWF (LAL)

03-09-2017

SALVADOR SANDOVAL, Petitioner, v. MARTIN BITER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.. § 2254(d)(2)(1), IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Final Report and Recommendation be approved and accepted;

2. The motion for a stay be denied;

3. Judgment be entered denying the Petition with prejudice (Claim One, the portion of Claim Two relating to the gang enhancement, and Claims Three through Six), except as to Petitioner's claim of insufficiency of the evidence for the conviction for street terrorism (a portion of Claim Two), which is granted; and
4. The Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Judgment, and the Denial of the Certificate of Appealability on the parties.
DATED: March 9, 2017

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sandoval v. Biter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 9, 2017
Case No. EDCV 13-1313-MWF (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Sandoval v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:SALVADOR SANDOVAL, Petitioner, v. MARTIN BITER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 9, 2017

Citations

Case No. EDCV 13-1313-MWF (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2017)