From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandles v. Geht

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
Case No. 12-12821 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-12821

10-31-2012

John Eric Sandles, Plaintiff, v. Jan Geht, et al., Defendants.


Honorable Sean F. Cox


ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOCKET ENTRY NO. 34)

This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Referral to Magistrate Judge.

The Court finds that oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process with respect to this motion. See Local Rule 7.1(f)(2), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan. The Court therefore orders that the motion will be decided without oral argument.

Having reviewed Plaintiff's motion, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED because Plaintiff has not demonstrated a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Sean F. Cox

U. S. District Court Judge
I hereby certify that on October 31, 2012, the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record by electronic means and upon John Eric Sandles by First Class Mail at the address below: John Eric Sandles
7266 Winthrop Street
Detroit, MI 48228

J. McCoy

Case Manager


Summaries of

Sandles v. Geht

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
Case No. 12-12821 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Sandles v. Geht

Case Details

Full title:John Eric Sandles, Plaintiff, v. Jan Geht, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-12821 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 31, 2012)