From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandlain v. Rickard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 20, 2020
No. 19-7460 (4th Cir. Apr. 20, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-7460

04-20-2020

BLAKE SANDLAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. BARBARA RICKARD, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Blake Sandlain, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00025-DAF) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Blake Sandlain, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Blake Sandlain, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying his motion for injunctive relief, and denying relief on Sandlain's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sandlain v. Richard, No. 1:19-cv-00025-DAF (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Sandlain v. Rickard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 20, 2020
No. 19-7460 (4th Cir. Apr. 20, 2020)
Case details for

Sandlain v. Rickard

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE SANDLAIN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. BARBARA RICKARD, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 20, 2020

Citations

No. 19-7460 (4th Cir. Apr. 20, 2020)