From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandisk Corp. v. Round Rock Research LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS

03-05-2013

SANDISK CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

CHUCK P. EBERTIN (SBN 161374) VINSON & ELKINS LLP CHRISTOPHER V. RYAN ( pro hac vice ) JANICE L. TA ( pro hac vice ) VINSON & ELKINS LLP DAVID J. TOBIN ( pro hac vice ) VINSON & ELKINS LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant SANDISK CORPORATION


CHUCK P. EBERTIN (SBN 161374)
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
CHRISTOPHER V. RYAN (pro hac vice)
JANICE L. TA (pro hac vice)
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
DAVID J. TOBIN (pro hac vice)
VINSON & ELKINS LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendant
SANDISK CORPORATION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON ROUND ROCK'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (DKT NO. 123)

On February 27, 2013, Round Rock Research LLC ("Round Rock") filed a motion for summary judgment on eight causes of action and four affirmative defenses asserted by SanDisk Corporation ("SanDisk"). [See Dkt. No. 123.] The Court subsequently issued a notice setting the hearing date for that motion for April 18, 2013. [See Dkt. No. 125.] Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, SanDisk Corporation and Round Rock Research have agreed to the following briefing schedule in view of the revised hearing date and the number of issues raised in the motion: SanDisk shall file its opposition to Round Rock's summary judgment motion on Friday, March 22, 2013, and Round Rock shall file its reply in support of its motion on Thursday, April 4, 2013. Pursuant to this stipulation, briefing on Round Rock's motion for summary judgment will be completed fourteen (14) days before the scheduled hearing date. This proposed time modification for briefing on Round Rock's motion will have no impact on other events scheduled in this case.

VINSON & ELKINS LLP By: ____________

Chuck P. Ebertin

Attorneys for

SANDISK CORPORATION

DESMARAIS LLP

By: ____________

John C. Spaccarotella (admitted pro hac vice)

Attorneys for

ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1

I, Chuck P. Ebertin, hereby attest that John Spaccarotella has concurred in the filing of this document.

By: _________

Chuck P. Ebertin

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SanDisk shall file its opposition to Round Rock's summary judgment motion (Docket No. 123) on Friday, March 22, 2013, and Round Rock shall file its reply in support of its motion on Thursday, April 4, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Honorable Richard Seeborg

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sandisk Corp. v. Round Rock Research LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Sandisk Corp. v. Round Rock Research LLC

Case Details

Full title:SANDISK CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. ROUND ROCK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-05243-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)