From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanderson v. Tulane Univ. Hosp. & Clinic

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 15, 2018
245 So. 3d 1043 (La. 2018)

Opinion

NO. 2018–CC–0588

06-15-2018

Richard SANDERSON v. TULANE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AND CLINIC, et al.


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

PER CURIAM

In the absence of any allegations that the medical review panel superceded its statutory authority, the panel’s opinion is subject to mandatory admission. La. R.S. 40:1231.8(H) ; McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital , 10-2775 (La. 7/1/11), 65 So.3d 1218. The mere fact that a member of the panel may not have disclosed a potential conflict of interest is not a ground for automatic exclusion of the panel’s opinion. See Elledge v. Williamson , 48, 644 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1/15/14), 132 So.3d 432 ; see also Derouen v. Kolb , 397 So.2d 791 (La.1981). Plaintiff will have an adequate opportunity to explore any potential bias on the part of the panel member through cross examination, and the trier of fact may assign any appropriate weight to the opinion in light of such testimony. See Whitt v. McBride , 94–896 (La. App. 3rd Cir. 3/01/95), 651 So.2d 427, writ denied , 95-0357 (La. 3/30/95), 651 So.2d 851. Accordingly, the writ is granted. The judgment of the district court striking the panel opinion is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

JOHNSON, C.J., would deny.

HUGHES, J., recused.

GENOVESE, J., would deny.


Summaries of

Sanderson v. Tulane Univ. Hosp. & Clinic

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 15, 2018
245 So. 3d 1043 (La. 2018)
Case details for

Sanderson v. Tulane Univ. Hosp. & Clinic

Case Details

Full title:Richard SANDERSON v. TULANE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AND CLINIC, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Jun 15, 2018

Citations

245 So. 3d 1043 (La. 2018)

Citing Cases

Valenzuela v. Danj

A medical review panel's opinion is subject to mandatory admission unless the panel exceeded its statutory…

Gros v. LAMMICO

Mrs. Gros had an opportunity to explore any potential bias on the part of Dr. Lyons through…