Opinion
1:19-cv-08423-GHW
06-13-2022
AFTERN SANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. LEG APPAREL LLC, AMIEE LYNN ACCESSORIES, INC., STEVEN H. SPOLANSKY, MELISSA ROMANINO, and STUART DIAMOND, Defendants.
ORDER
GREGORY H. WOODS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
For the reasons stated on the record during the hearing held on June 13, 2022, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to strike and DENIES Plaintiff's request for a pre-trial hearing on the admissibility of Glassdoor reviews as evidence. Dkt. Nos. 206, 225.
The Court construes Plaintiff's motion for a pre-trial hearing on the admissibility of psychiatric notes as evidence, Dkt. No. 228, to be an objection by Plaintiff under Rule 34(b)(2) to Defendants' request for production of psychiatric notes or to be a motion to quash a subpoena under Rule 45(d)(3), if Defendants have issued a subpoena seeking psychiatric notes. See Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 475 (2d Cir. 2006) (“pro se litigants must be accorded ‘special solicitude'”). Defendants are directed to file a response to Plaintiff's submission by no later than June 22, 2022. Plaintiff is directed to file a reply, if any, to Defendants' submission no later than June 29, 2022.
SO ORDERED.