From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanderson v. Epstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1941
262 App. Div. 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

October 6, 1941.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the collision of two automobiles, respondent recovered judgment against the owner of one of the automobiles, one Barney Epstein, and the appellant, a garageman, at whose garage the car was left for repairs. Judgment of the County Court of Westchester County, in so far as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The court charged as a matter of law that defendant Epstein was the owner of the car. No exception was taken and the charge thus became the law of the case. Prior to the accident, the repairs to the car, in so far as the appellant had facilities to make them, had been completed. The appellant had contracted with one Linton, as an independent contractor, to repair the fenders, remove certain dents in the body and repaint the car where necessary. While the car was being driven by Linton to his place of business, the accident occurred solely by reason of his negligence. Under these facts the appellant may not be held liable for the negligence of Linton. ( Irwin v. Klein, 271 N.Y. 477.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanderson v. Epstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1941
262 App. Div. 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Sanderson v. Epstein

Case Details

Full title:MARJORIE M. SANDERSON, Respondent, v. BARNEY EPSTEIN, Defendant, and ABE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1941

Citations

262 App. Div. 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Williams

Sufficient proof was adduced at the trial to justify the jury's verdict against Barber. The verdict indicates…