From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanderson v. Elman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 21, 1963
18 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

February 21, 1963

Appeal from the Onondaga Trial Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Certain additional findings made. Memorandum: We find no jurisdictional errors in the tax foreclosure proceeding based upon failure to pay 1953 taxes. Therefore, Enivel Realty Corporation has title to the property to the exclusion of the plaintiff, Sanderson, and the judgment should be affirmed. However, there is an additional ground for affirmance and that is that the defendant Elman, Enivel Realty Corporation's grantor, received a tax deed in 1958 based upon a 1948 default. There is no defect in that proceeding. We find that this deed, in itself, was effective to pass good title. Halpern, J., concurs in result solely on the additional ground stated in the memorandum.


Summaries of

Sanderson v. Elman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 21, 1963
18 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Sanderson v. Elman

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE E. SANDERSON, Appellant, v. ISADORE J. ELMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
238 N.Y.S.2d 168