Opinion
No. 08-6434.
Submitted: August 14, 2008.
Decided: August 19, 2008.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:06-cv-01670-MBS).
Ricky Darren Sanders, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Davidson, Morrison Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; John Evans James, III, John E. James II Law Office, Winnsboro, South Carolina; Lucy Grey Wilson McIver, Lee, Erter, Wilson, James, Holler Smith, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina; Kathleen Devereaux Cauthen, Cauthen Law Firm, Blythewood, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ricky Darren Sanders, Sr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v. County of Sumter, No. 0:06-cv-01670-MBS (D.S.C. filed Mar. 4, 2008 entered Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Because Sanders specifically objected to only one aspect of the report of the magistrate judge after proper notice of the need to file specific objections, only that issue is preserved for our review. See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621-22 (4th Cir. 2007)
AFFIRMED.