From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 22, 1995
663 So. 2d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-00829.

November 22, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Hugh D. Hayes, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Sr. Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


The defendant contends, and the state agrees, that this case should be reversed and remanded for correction of a clerical error on the written judgment and sentence. The transcript shows that, at the sentencing hearing, the parties and the court agreed that the defendant's new sentences would be served concurrently with each other and with any sentences he was already serving at that time. The written judgment and sentence, however, fails to specify that the sentences are to be served concurrent with the sentences that the defendant was serving at the time. On remand, the judgment and sentence should be corrected to conform with the court's oral pronouncement.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and FULMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sanders v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 22, 1995
663 So. 2d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Sanders v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH WARREN SANDERS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 22, 1995

Citations

663 So. 2d 674 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

State v. Paulino

The trial court orally announced that the sentences were to be served concurrently, but did not indicate that…