Summary
concluding that plaintiff did not have a federal statutory or constitutional right to demand an internal affairs investigation
Summary of this case from Ladd v. HeathOpinion
No. 5:10CV00281 JLH/JTR.
October 22, 2010
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted.
2. Dismissal of this action CONSTITUTES a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 22nd day of October, 2010.