From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. Grimes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2021
1:18-cv-01285-AWI-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2021)

Opinion

1:18-cv-01285-AWI-JLT (PC)

06-24-2021

TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. GRIMES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff has filed a request for voluntary dismissal without prejudice. (Doc. 54.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal, and no opposing party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to terminate all pending motions and to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanders v. Grimes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2021
1:18-cv-01285-AWI-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Sanders v. Grimes

Case Details

Full title:TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. GRIMES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

1:18-cv-01285-AWI-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2021)