Sanders v. Feather

Full title: JASON THOMAS SANDERS, Petitioner, v. MARION FEATHER, Warden, FCI Sheridan…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 25, 2014

3:14-CV-00223-JE (D. Or. Sep. 25, 2014)

Opinion

3:14-CV-00223-JE

09-25-2014

JASON THOMAS SANDERS, Petitioner, v. MARION FEATHER, Warden, FCI Sheridan Respondent.

BROWN, Judge.

ORDER

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#11) on July 11, 2014, in which he recommends the Court deny Petitioner Jason Thomas Sanders's Petition (#1) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and enter a judgment dismissing this matter with prejudice. Petitioner filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9^th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9^th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

This Court has carefully considered Petitioner's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#11) and, therefore, DENIES the Petition (#1) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 25^th day of September, 2014.

/s/_________

ANNA J. BROW

United States District Judge