From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. CPL N.E. Post

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 31, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16cv00065 (W.D. Va. May. 31, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:16cv00065

05-31-2016

WILLIAM W. SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. CPL N.E. POST, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 9, 2016, the court received notice that plaintiff William W. Sanders has been released from jail. Because he was released, Sanders is no longer subject to the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act which afforded him the benefit of paying the filing fee in installments. By order entered May 11, 2016, the court assessed Sanders the balance of the filing fee and directed him to pay the amount in full or otherwise respond to the court's order within ten days. The court advised Sanders that failure to comply with the court's order would result in the immediate dismissal of this action without prejudice. The time to comply has passed and Sanders has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, I will dismiss Sanders' complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with the court's order. Sanders is advised that he may refile his claims in a separate action.

ENTER: This 31st day of May, 2016.

/s/_________

NORMAN K. MOON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sanders v. CPL N.E. Post

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 31, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16cv00065 (W.D. Va. May. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Sanders v. CPL N.E. Post

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM W. SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. CPL N.E. POST, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: May 31, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:16cv00065 (W.D. Va. May. 31, 2016)