Sanders v. Belleque

Full title: GEORGE DOUGLAS SANDERS, Petitioner, v. BRIAN BELLEQUE, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

CV 06-1558-AS (D. Or. Nov. 16, 2007)

Opinion

CV 06-1558-AS.

November 16, 2007

ORDER

MALCOLM MARSH, Senior District Judge

Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 16, 2007. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Petitioner filed timely objections. I have, therefore, given the file of this case a de novo review. I do not find any error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation (#34) of Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas.

IT IS SO ORDERED.