From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. Astrue

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 3, 2012
No. 1:10-cv-01084-CL (D. Or. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cv-01084-CL

02-03-2012

DAVID ROSS SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge;

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given the legal issues de novo review. I agree with Magistrate Judge Clarke that the ALJ's decision was based on correct legal standards and supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (#10) are adopted. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sanders v. Astrue

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 3, 2012
No. 1:10-cv-01084-CL (D. Or. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Sanders v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROSS SANDERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

No. 1:10-cv-01084-CL (D. Or. Feb. 3, 2012)